Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters – maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Engine size & performance
Is it big enough
Wednesday,4 September, 2013
7:16 am
Avatar
Nottingham Castle Marina – today, may be different tomorrow
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 23
Member Since:
Tuesday,1 November, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

After what seems a year or so, but really is about two and a half months the sold sign has finally been attached to the estate agents board by our front gate. I am fully aware that the property is not sold until the money is in our bank account but we are now looking for a boat. Not just any boat but our first boat.

We found one that we liked the look of but I have a major worry, so much so that we have decided to look elsewhere. The problem with the boat is that from my limited knowledge, it is underpowered. As I have been looking at other boat adverts I see that this is by no means a one off.

The boat is a 57ft narrow boat with a Canaline 38 engine. The Canaline brochure states that the 38 engine is suitable for a 57ft boat on canals only. 

Am I being realistic thinking that the boat will be underpowered, if so why would anyone fit an undersized engine in a new boat? It will be our first boat, but I have been around engines all my working life both working on and driving them. I have always believed there is no substitute for CC’s. In other words, the bigger the better, within reason. 

We will be living aboard, this first winter in a marina, cruising throughout the summer and then maybe a marina for the following winter, but maybe we continue with our travels. At any rate, the one thing I don’t want is a boat that is underpowered.

Are my conclusions correct or is a 38hp engine up to the job with a 57ft liveaboard narrow boat? Any help would be appreciated before we commit to buying.

 

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
9:34 am
Avatar
Anywhere on the system
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 19
Member Since:
Friday,11 February, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You are quite right thinking that you might struggle a bit on rivers with a 38, but I was on the Severn earlier this year travelling with another boat that had a Canaline 38 fitted, and he made fair progress, against the tide, when it was just off an amber warning. We have a Beta 43, and it did perform better, but not that much.

Jolly Roger

The Cat’s Whiskers NB

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
9:59 am
Avatar
Continuous Cruiser
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 968
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

When we crossed the Ribble Link in 2011, one 57ft boat made such poor progress against the tides that he missed the ‘window’ to go up the brook and was diverted up to Preston Dock. On the plus side he said the dock was well worth the visit.

 

Regards

Pete

Living retirement in the slow lane.

20 years hiring, 6 years of shared ownership and a Continuous Cruiser since 2007 but still learning!

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
11:30 am
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The speed that a boat will do or the current that it will punch against is not a matter just the engine size. It is more to do with hull shape, particularly the bow and swim and the propeller.

 

I have a 50 footer with a good bow and swim with a Lister HRM 2, about 25 hp. Now some would say that she is under powered. I can tell you she cruised up the Severn very nicely with power in hand. On the canals she will very easily exceed the 4mph limit if I am dozing on the job.

 

Before you dismiss the boat with the Canaline 38 in it take it for a cruise and try it for yourself and get the feel of the boat. It very easily could be that the hull, propeller, engine combination are very good for that boat of it could be bad. Only way to know is try it and see. :)

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
7:51 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As GM said it is not just engine size.  I have  a 38hp on my 54ft and have had no problems, although I have not had to go against a strong tide.  Waiting for the lock against the tide on the Trent she held position on tickover and can do 6.5mph flat out.  So I would not think the boat you saw was underpowered but admit I have no experience other than what I have just stated.

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Thursday,5 September, 2013
12:26 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 183
Member Since:
Monday,21 May, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

We have a Beta43 on a 62ft boat (one year old). It’s a hydraulic drive to the prop so we lose a whopping 20% or so of the power compared to 5-10% with a PRM box. We also have the bow thruster driven off the same hydraulics.

Bottom line is it all works just fine, and we cruise the Seven / Avon with no problems.

Keep in mind you are on a NB (sorry to state the obvious) and they are meant to be on canals. If you try to navigate a river in high flow then I wish you all the best. As soon as you get the bow off centre the current will grab you with a force that reminds you just how powerful water currents can be, and why you should have stayed moored up and chilled out. 

I did it just once on the Avon. The ‘state’ was Green but I could see a significant flow. Edged away from our mooring and within seconds I was struggling for control. It was OK but it taught me lesson. 60ft ish of boat length gives the flow a big amount of leverage so within reason I’m not sure any canal engine would deal with this.

Cruisers have big engines and steerable g/box props… for good reason :)

On the plus side, my guess is you will be fine 99.9% of time as long as you don’t try to do something NB’s are not designed for. Also we NB folk use appx 1.5 ltr per hour compared to many Ltr/hr for a river / sea going monster. It’s all so much more relaxed !!

PB

Friday,6 September, 2013
7:00 am
Avatar
Jersey
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 82
Member Since:
Monday,11 April, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi there

 

We’ve got a 57′ narrow boat with a 38hp engine and when we brought it the size of the engine was not even on our checklist – DOH! We’ve mainly done canals so far, including the Llangollen that has got quite a flow and the River Weaver although that was during quite a dry spell so there was almost no run at all.

 

The engine size has been in the back of our mind though and more so recently because we’ve been building up to doing The Ribble Link that we just did yesterday, well yesterday and the day before actually as we ran out of water and got diverted to Preston Docks. This was more due to being the last out of the lock and a particularly low tide on the day though as we did the journey in two hours that I believe is the norm and kept pace with the other boats doing the trip on the day albeit a lock or two’s distance behind. We didn’t want to push the engine too hard as we normally just potter around at about 1,000 revs so did the trip at 1,500 revs and seemed fine, didn’t overheat and that we’d been told to keep a check on as this can be a problem. Had we upped it a couple hundred revs more we may have caught up and got through, but we weren’t in a particular rush.

 

The plus side of Preston Docks was a Morrison’s about five minutes walk away, the marina had washing machines and tumble dryers, water, Elsan Point and we brought (well ordered it, picking it up on the way back) a low voltage twin tub washing machine for £57 that we’d been thinking of buying that’s about half the price we were expecting to pay. So, best diversion we’ve every had. We did the overall journey from Tarleton Lock to Preston docks that’s about 9.5 miles in 2.75 hours so we averaged about 3.5 mph and that was against the tidal flow for about 2.5 hours of the way.

 

With all that said though, I’d probably be happier with a larger engine as it may present us with problems on the faster flowing rivers to come, but as we’re not running to any timescale, if we have to stay moored for a period of time until it’s okay to move then so be it.

 

Bit of a sitting on the fence answer to your question I know, but it takes all sorts of information to come to a decision and hopefully this’ll help in some way.

 

Regards,

 

Keith

Enjoying the Dream ( Keith & Nicky http://narrowboatboysontour.bl…..gspot.com/ )

Friday,6 September, 2013
8:13 am
Avatar
Southam, Warwickshire
Admin
Forum Posts: 1797
Member Since:
Friday,19 February, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I haven’t done any river cruising in my boat (I’ve done the Thames from Oxford down to Reading in one of Calcutt Boats’ own build boats) but my boat has done plenty of river cruising.

James’ original owners had the boat from 1977 to 1997. They lived in central London, kept James on a mooring near their home during the winter, then every summer did the Thames ring coming up to Calcutt for the summer and then returning to London in the autumn. I’ve been in touch with the owner’s daughter who told me that they never had a problem on the Thames with James. The original engine is still in the boat. It’s a Mercedes 38hp OM636.

Click here to get a FREE copy of “Living On A Narrowboat:101 Essential Narrowboat Articles”

Friday,6 September, 2013
8:33 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

NB Badger Sett said

The engine size has been in the back of our mind though and more so recently because we’ve been building up to doing The Ribble Link that we just did yesterday, well yesterday and the day before actually as we ran out of water and got diverted to Preston Docks. This was more due to being the last out of the lock and a particularly low tide on the day though as we did the journey in two hours that I believe is the norm and kept pace with the other boats doing the trip on the day albeit a lock or two’s distance behind. We didn’t want to push the engine too hard as we normally just potter around at about 1,000 revs so did the trip at 1,500 revs and seemed fine, didn’t overheat and that we’d been told to keep a check on as this can be a problem. Had we upped it a couple hundred revs more we may have caught up and got through, but we weren’t in a particular rush.

I forgot to say, in my previous post that I have overheated twice.  The first time when it was getting dark and there was no sign of a decent mooring so I started thrashing it a bit at about 2400 revs – my normal cruising is at 1600revs.  I found the prop was a bit fouled and put it down to that.  The second time was a bit more worrying – on the tidal Trent a week ago, when I was again travelling at 2400 revs – I was mighty relieved when the warning light went out after a bit of time in idle.  I may try fitting a new thermostat before going back on the Trent next week.

The real reason for the post is to offer two tips which everyone may not know:

If you have a central heating system which also heats the water, open all radiators and start the pump but do not turn on the gas.  The water circulating through the calorifier, heats the radiators a bit and helps cool the engine (also useful for a bit of free heat).

As an emergency measure run all the hot water out of the calorifier.

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Friday,6 September, 2013
9:11 am
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

NB Badger Sett said The engine size has been in the back of our mind though and more so recently because we’ve been building up to doing The Ribble Link that we just did yesterday, well yesterday and the day before actually as we ran out of water and got diverted to Preston Docks. This was more due to being the last out of the lock and a particularly low tide on the day though as we did the journey in two hours that I believe is the norm and kept pace with the other boats doing the trip on the day albeit a lock or two’s distance behind. We didn’t want to push the engine too hard as we normally just potter around at about 1,000 revs so did the trip at 1,500 revs and seemed fine, didn’t overheat and that we’d been told to keep a check on as this can be a problem. Had we upped it a couple hundred revs more we may have caught up and got through, but we weren’t in a particular rush. I forgot to say, in my previous post that I have overheated twice.  The first time when it was getting dark and there was no sign of a decent mooring so I started thrashing it a bit at about 2400 revs – my normal cruising is at 1600revs.  I found the prop was a bit fouled and put it down to that.  The second time was a bit more worrying – on the tidal Trent a week ago, when I was again travelling at 2400 revs – I was mighty relieved when the warning light went out after a bit of time in idle.  I may try fitting a new thermostat before going back on the Trent next week. The real reason for the post is to offer two tips which everyone may not know: If you have a central heating system which also heats the water, open all radiators and start the pump but do not turn on the gas.  The water circulating through the calorifier, heats the radiators a bit and helps cool the engine (also useful for a bit of free heat). As an emergency measure run all the hot water out of the calorifier.

Alan,

No sure how old your boat is but I have come across something similar in the past with boats that have a skin tank for cooling. Every couple of years the boat is black and the skin tank is blacked as well. Every coating of blacking acts as insulation so the efficiency of the skin tank is reduce and gradually the engine starts to over heat. There are two alternatives, one is to add a new skin tank or the other is every few years scrape the majority of the blacking off the skin tank before the blacking takes place. Just a thought

Happy cruising all

Friday,6 September, 2013
1:17 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks Keith, good point.  In my naivete I did not enquire what exactly was done when she was blacked last March.

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Saturday,7 September, 2013
6:51 am
Avatar
Jersey
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 82
Member Since:
Monday,11 April, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

NB Badger Sett said
Hi there

 

We’ve got a 57′ narrow boat with a 38hp engine and when we brought it the size of the engine was not even on our checklist – DOH! We’ve mainly done canals so far, including the Llangollen that has got quite a flow and the River Weaver although that was during quite a dry spell so there was almost no run at all.

 

The engine size has been in the back of our mind though and more so recently because we’ve been building up to doing The Ribble Link that we just did yesterday, well yesterday and the day before actually as we ran out of water and got diverted to Preston Docks. This was more due to being the last out of the lock and a particularly low tide on the day though as we did the journey in two hours that I believe is the norm and kept pace with the other boats doing the trip on the day albeit a lock or two’s distance behind. We didn’t want to push the engine too hard as we normally just potter around at about 1,000 revs so did the trip at 1,500 revs and seemed fine, didn’t overheat and that we’d been told to keep a check on as this can be a problem. Had we upped it a couple hundred revs more we may have caught up and got through, but we weren’t in a particular rush.

 

The plus side of Preston Docks was a Morrison’s about five minutes walk away, the marina had washing machines and tumble dryers, water, Elsan Point and we brought (well ordered it, picking it up on the way back) a low voltage twin tub washing machine for £57 that we’d been thinking of buying that’s about half the price we were expecting to pay. So, best diversion we’ve every had. We did the overall journey from Tarleton Lock to Preston docks that’s about 9.5 miles in 2.75 hours so we averaged about 3.5 mph and that was against the tidal flow for about 2.5 hours of the way.

 

With all that said though, I’d probably be happier with a larger engine as it may present us with problems on the faster flowing rivers to come, but as we’re not running to any timescale, if we have to stay moored for a period of time until it’s okay to move then so be it.

 

Bit of a sitting on the fence answer to your question I know, but it takes all sorts of information to come to a decision and hopefully this’ll help in some way.

 

Regards,

 

Keith

I stand corrected (by my wife who clearly knows more than me) but our engine is 35hp not 38hp as I’d advised above.

Enjoying the Dream ( Keith & Nicky http://narrowboatboysontour.bl…..gspot.com/ )

Saturday,7 September, 2013
10:43 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Alan said

NB Badger Sett said
The engine size has been in the back of our mind though and more so recently because we’ve been building up to doing The Ribble Link that we just did yesterday, well yesterday and the day before actually as we ran out of water and got diverted to Preston Docks. This was more due to being the last out of the lock and a particularly low tide on the day though as we did the journey in two hours that I believe is the norm and kept pace with the other boats doing the trip on the day albeit a lock or two’s distance behind. We didn’t want to push the engine too hard as we normally just potter around at about 1,000 revs so did the trip at 1,500 revs and seemed fine, didn’t overheat and that we’d been told to keep a check on as this can be a problem. Had we upped it a couple hundred revs more we may have caught up and got through, but we weren’t in a particular rush.

I forgot to say, in my previous post that I have overheated twice.  The first time when it was getting dark and there was no sign of a decent mooring so I started thrashing it a bit at about 2400 revs – my normal cruising is at 1600revs.  I found the prop was a bit fouled and put it down to that.  The second time was a bit more worrying – on the tidal Trent a week ago, when I was again travelling at 2400 revs – I was mighty relieved when the warning light went out after a bit of time in idle.  I may try fitting a new thermostat before going back on the Trent next week.

The real reason for the post is to offer two tips which everyone may not know:

If you have a central heating system which also heats the water, open all radiators and start the pump but do not turn on the gas.  The water circulating through the calorifier, heats the radiators a bit and helps cool the engine (also useful for a bit of free heat).

As an emergency measure run all the hot water out of the calorifier.

Since posting the above, I have been told by someone who knows what he is talking about that 2400 is probably a bit high for continuous running for my engine.

 

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Saturday,7 September, 2013
1:35 pm
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Alan said
Since posting the above, I have been told by someone who knows what he is talking about that 2400 is probably a bit high for continuous running for my engine.

Alan,

What engine have you got?

 

 

Saturday,7 September, 2013
2:35 pm
Avatar
round ‘n’ about
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 60
Member Since:
Wednesday,30 March, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi Russ2903

 

The other thing to consider is resale value, if you are having second thoughts about the canaline 38 then so may others in the future, it is, I believe, a bit of a budget engine. 

James and Debbie

NB Lois Jane
http://nb-lois-jane.blogspot.co.uk/

Saturday,7 September, 2013
3:16 pm
Avatar
Continuous Cruiser
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 968
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

When we went across the Ribble Link we had a pilot. He opened the throttle up and said to me ‘how fast can this engine go@ my reply was, ‘I don’t know, I’ve never had it this fast’. That was 2300 rpm on a Beta 43.

The coolant temperature never altered during the crossing.

 

Regards

Pete

Living retirement in the slow lane.

20 years hiring, 6 years of shared ownership and a Continuous Cruiser since 2007 but still learning!

Saturday,7 September, 2013
5:31 pm
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This sounds a bit like tell me that my car cannot travel at 120, well within its capabilities, because it will overheat. It still sounds like the cooling tank, either too much blacking, or of course the cooling system was never specified for it maximum power which I suggest it should have been. It would be nice to know who manufactured the engine and which model it is.

Saturday,7 September, 2013
7:54 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Beta 38.  2006 but only 400 hours when I bought her.  I have added over 200

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Saturday,7 September, 2013
10:04 pm
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Beta 38.  2006 but only 400 hours when I bought her.  I have added over 200

:) At 600 hours that is barely run in. If you look at http://www.betamarine.co.uk/in…..1.pdf You will see this engine does not develop its 35 BHP until about 2800RPM. That leaves me puzzled as to how “…someone who knows what he is talking about that 2400 is probably a bit high for continuous running for my engine”. 2000RPM is about the peak torgue point but that is not the maximum revs the engine will happily run at.

Having read through the manual that engine should run at about 85/95C.

I am puzzled that this engine is overheating at 2400 RPM. It is suggesting to me that something is wrong with the cooling circuit. I am assuming that the prop etc have been properly sized for both the boat, gearbox and the engine. I would be interested what Beta Marine would have to say, so I have emailed them asking what the maximum continuous RPM is for the engine. I will post a copy of the email if I get a reply.

 

Interestingly the sea going version develops max power at 3600 RPM

Sunday,8 September, 2013
8:36 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks GM.  My thoughts were that it should run OK at 2400, although I know nothing about engines.  I will check with the boatyard re blacking.  Do you think it is worth replacing the thermostat – I cannot see what good that would do but another boater suggested it.  Could it be the temperature sensor?  Is there any way to check the water temperature?  I cannot help on prop size etc.

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 298

Currently Online:
5 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

pearley: 968

Alan: 637

GM: 462

deckhand: 296

richardhula: 292

Paul B: 183

Johny London: 142

martincowin: 120

MikeEaves: 116

Our Nige: 110

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 71

Members: 15870

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 10

Topics: 1461

Posts: 9028

Administrators: Paul Smith: 1797