Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters – maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Battery Monitors
Are they any good?
Wednesday,4 September, 2013
9:24 am
Avatar
Anywhere on the system
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 19
Member Since:
Friday,11 February, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

When we had our present boat built a couple of years ago, I enquired about having a gauge fitted so I could check the battery charge and its accumulated amps  at a glance.

At the time, our builders advised against fitting one. Their argument being that they were very expensive for what they were and also the fact that they were not very accurate and should be used only as a guide.

On our travels around the system we have come across a few boats that have these battery monitors fitted and, in general, they all seemed quite pleased with the purchase. I know there are several on the market (Victron and Smart Guage being the two I’ve seen).

Have any of you out there got something similar fitted and what do you think of them? Are they fairly accurate these days, and do they offer good value for money? Look forward to your replies.

Roger

(The Cat’s Whiskers NB)

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
9:50 am
Avatar
Aldermaston
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 292
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Most battery monitors work with an external shunt inserted into one of the main battery leads (usually the negative) such that all current flow in or out of the batteries pass through it. The display part of the battery monitor is able to convert the minuscule voltage developed across this shunt into a current readout so you know what is going in or coming out of your batteries at any time. Given this information they can also record the battery state-of-charge (SOC) usually as a percentage of fully charged (100%) as well as voltage.

The Smartgauge works in a unique and entirely different manner to produce similar SOC and voltage information but not current flow in/out of batteries. It achieves this with just a thin wire connection to the battery bank, so is much easier to fit. After connection it takes a short while to self learn your system after which it gives accurate SOC and voltage readings.

Designed for non-technical customers it may be the way to go if this gives you adequate info.

Given the price of batteries I would consider some form of battery monitoring essential to ensure they are not inadvertently abused.

Regards – Richard –
Ecky Thump

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
10:08 am
Avatar
Continuous Cruiser
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 968
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Adding to that which Richard has said, most, but not all, battery monitors that use shunts require them to fitted in the negative leads. On Joanie M the three battery banks  (domestic, starter, generator) have the negatives all looped together so separating them to fit a shunt in the domestic line would be a major job. Some monitor shunts can go in the positive side but with alternator charge cable, inverter feed, domestic electric feed, solar charge, all coming from different places on the domestic bank would again require rewiring or several shunts.

That’s why I have a Smartguage., easy to fit and easy to use. Just press a button and it displays your SOC. Knowing how much actual current you are using at any particular moment of time is a bit academic. In my opinion.

The Smartguage website gives a very detailed description of how it, and other monitors, work.

 

Regards

Pete

Living retirement in the slow lane.

20 years hiring, 6 years of shared ownership and a Continuous Cruiser since 2007 but still learning!

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
11:15 am
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mmmm To measure current or not to measure current and rely only on battery voltage. 

 

The parameter of a battery that we use is the current (Amps or Amp/Hours) the battery voltage rises and falls dependant on the battery type and to en extent the state of change of the battery. According to all the professionals that I have known over the years there is only one way to know whether a battery is fully charged and that is to know the specific gravity (SG) of the electrolyte when it was added to the battery and when the battery attains that SG it is fully charged. 

 

The voltage when charging a battery is, I am told, a factor of the battery’s internal resistance. Thus it is also related to the quality of the battery. Now if you have sealed batteries you cannot measure the SG, so they only thing you have got left is to count the current that you use from the battery and then count it back again. i.e. Using something like the BMV602 or similar. That does mean installing a shunt as the last item before the battery. Generally I have not found doing so to be a difficult task, all that is needed is to remove the (assuming Negative lead shunt) the negative leads from the battery fit a short battery lead going to the shunt and then connect whatever was connected to the negative terminal to the shunt. 

 

That then gives a measure of the current leaving the battery and the current going to the battery, and using the computer in the BMV602 etc the system will tell you if your batteries are fully charged or not. 

 

Oh thought for battery read battery bank if you have more than one battery in series or parallel 

 

I would not be without mine. The correlation between the BMV and the SG is very very close.

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
11:54 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
Monday,8 April, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi all,

I have Tri-metric TM-2020 from Bogart Engineering http://www.bogartengineering.com which is connected to the negative side the battery bank and needs a shunt arrangment. It will cover battery voltages from 8 to 30 as standard. 

This has functioned without fault now for nearly 10 years.

It records –

Current battery voltage.

Current battery input/output in amps.

Current battery charge as a % figure. This does go out of synch periodically needing to be reset after an an equalising charge. 

Maximum battery voltage.

Minimum battery voltage.

Daily amp taken from battery.

Balance of amps in verses amps out.

and more besides.

 

Don’t know if they are still in business or if you can get this in the UK but it has been very versatile and reliable with more information available than an ordinary person needs.

By observing my records from this especially the load/voltage I can quite accurately assess the state/life of the battery.

Checking the low voltage figure gives you a pretty good idea of the real battery strength/resistance to discharge e.g when you fridge starts up.

A properly cared for battery with the correct charge/discharge regime will last a lot longer.

 

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
4:17 pm
Avatar
Aldermaston
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 292
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

GM said
mmmm To measure current or not to measure current and rely only on battery voltage. 

 

The parameter of a battery that we use is the current (Amps or Amp/Hours) the battery voltage rises and falls dependant on the battery type and to en extent the state of change of the battery. According to all the professionals that I have known over the years there is only one way to know whether a battery is fully charged and that is to know the specific gravity (SG) of the electrolyte when it was added to the battery and when the battery attains that SG it is fully charged. 

 

The voltage when charging a battery is, I am told, a factor of the battery’s internal resistance. Thus it is also related to the quality of the battery. Now if you have sealed batteries you cannot measure the SG, so they only thing you have got left is to count the current that you use from the battery and then count it back again. i.e. Using something like the BMV602 or similar. That does mean installing a shunt as the last item before the battery. Generally I have not found doing so to be a difficult task, all that is needed is to remove the (assuming Negative lead shunt) the negative leads from the battery fit a short battery lead going to the shunt and then connect whatever was connected to the negative terminal to the shunt. 

 

That then gives a measure of the current leaving the battery and the current going to the battery, and using the computer in the BMV602 etc the system will tell you if your batteries are fully charged or not. 

 

Oh thought for battery read battery bank if you have more than one battery in series or parallel 

 

I would not be without mine. The correlation between the BMV and the SG is very very close.

I agree that a simple battery voltage measurement doesn’t give the whole picture, although if batteries are left to stand with no load for 30 minutes or so the voltage measured can give a very good indication of state-of-charge (SOC). Clearly this is not practical as an everyday means of determining their state and neither is measuring the SG of the electrolyte. 

What you dismissed in your post though is the Smartgauge as endorsed by Pete/perley. Although it only measures battery voltage, it has very complex algorithms within its display electronics that can sense most/charge discharge situations whilst they are happening and still give an accurate SOC with its self learning function which also compensates for battery ageing.

FWIW I have two shunt based Victron BMV600 battery monitors similar to yours, to display service and bowthruster battery banks. I wouldn’t be without the current display information as well as the rest, but knowing how to interpret the info is not for all. This is where the Smartgauge shines giving basic accurate info on battery SOC together with simple installation. 

Note also that the amp hour/SOC displays on shunt based monitors can quickly loose their calibration if the batteries aren’t regularly brought up to 100% SOC. They also require manual calibration to compensate for battery ageing.

Regards – Richard –
Ecky Thump

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
5:37 pm
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

GM said mmmm To measure current or not to measure current and rely only on battery voltage.    The parameter of a battery that we use is the current (Amps or Amp/Hours) the battery voltage rises and falls dependant on the battery type and to en extent the state of change of the battery. According to all the professionals that I have known over the years there is only one way to know whether a battery is fully charged and that is to know the specific gravity (SG) of the electrolyte when it was added to the battery and when the battery attains that SG it is fully charged.    The voltage when charging a battery is, I am told, a factor of the battery’s internal resistance. Thus it is also related to the quality of the battery. Now if you have sealed batteries you cannot measure the SG, so they only thing you have got left is to count the current that you use from the battery and then count it back again. i.e. Using something like the BMV602 or similar. That does mean installing a shunt as the last item before the battery. Generally I have not found doing so to be a difficult task, all that is needed is to remove the (assuming Negative lead shunt) the negative leads from the battery fit a short battery lead going to the shunt and then connect whatever was connected to the negative terminal to the shunt.    That then gives a measure of the current leaving the battery and the current going to the battery, and using the computer in the BMV602 etc the system will tell you if your batteries are fully charged or not.    Oh thought for battery read battery bank if you have more than one battery in series or parallel    I would not be without mine. The correlation between the BMV and the SG is very very close.I agree that a simple battery voltage measurement doesn’t give the whole picture, although if batteries are left to stand with no load for 30 minutes or so the voltage measured can give a very good indication of state-of-charge (SOC). Clearly this is not practical as an everyday means of determining their state and neither is measuring the SG of the electrolyte.  What you dismissed in your post though is the Smartgauge as endorsed by Pete/perley. Although it only measures battery voltage, it has very complex algorithms within its display electronics that can sense most/charge discharge situations whilst they are happening and still give an accurate SOC with its self learning function which also compensates for battery ageing. FWIW I have two shunt based Victron BMV600 battery monitors similar to yours, to display service and bowthruster battery banks. I wouldn’t be without the current display information as well as the rest, but knowing how to interpret the info is not for all. This is where the Smartgauge shines giving basic accurate info on battery SOC together with simple installation.  Note also that the amp hour/SOC displays on shunt based monitors can quickly loose their calibration if the batteries aren’t regularly brought up to 100% SOC. They also require manual calibration to compensate for battery ageing.

Sorry I can’t agree, I have tested battery banks that used the Smartgauge, according to the Smartgauge they were fully charged yet SG was down in the 1.200, which is about 50%. When charged the SG came up. Now that is only one occurrence but it leads me to be cautious about the Smartgauge.

I think you will find that the BMV style is more reliable when correctly set-up

Wednesday,4 September, 2013
8:03 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I am very happy with my Smatguage though have not tested its accuracy.  From reports I have read it seems to be pretty accurate once it has “learned” your set up.  I would not be without it.

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Thursday,5 September, 2013
1:01 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 183
Member Since:
Monday,21 May, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

One of my favorite topics !!

Until recently I believed that a shunt / current tap was the only way to measure battery performance and the health of charging and discharging of the batt bank. There are plenty out there as long as you can easily fit the shunt.

Then I read Alans recent post re Smartguage.

I would reccomend you look at thier site. I think they have a point about current measurement.

The issue is that a monitor based on current in/out measurement loses sync with the actual batt bank over time and so becomes (very) inaccurate.

The smart guage claims to be able to use voltage calcs over time (as I recall) to give a % capacity and does not get out of sync.

We have just been quoted £750 + vat to fit a batt monitor. I think not !! I’m now thinking that a combination of current measurement (because I really would like to know what the alternator is putting in and all the loads are taking out) and a smart guage is the best approach.

Does all this matter, or is it just tech mumbo jumbo ??

Well a bank of 6 batts even cheap lead/acid costs in the region of £800+ and if you discharge them too far they are scrap very soon. But if you run your engine when you don’t need to then that is costing you apprx £1 per hour and it is very ineffficient and will probably never get a full charge into the bank. Not to mention what you are doing to the engine on low revs and light load.

So I hope this thread runs on and on with real life examples of how boaters (especialy CC’ers) manage thier batt bank and any monitors they use.

PB

Thursday,5 September, 2013
7:16 am
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

We have just been quoted £750 + vat to fit a batt monitor.

I really do not understand how anyone could quote £750 plus vat to fit a battery monitor. Even being generous it should not take more than 5 hours, so say £50/hr inc vat plus the monitor say at £150 inc vat £400 would be the maximum I would expect. In reality it should take less than two hours.

Batteries and Battery charging is part science and part black art :) Every manufacturer does it differently and it is difficult to get the detailed information about a particular battery, its charge voltages etc. Even the SGs are different. Periodically there appears on the market various bits & pieces that are supposed to improve charging, battery life etc. Remarkably a large number do little if anything to improve the lot of the owner of the batteries.

As for the Smartgauge I believe there is only one way to test it properly, that is not in a lab but on a boat running in parallel with something like the BMV 600 or similar. I would love to do it but the cost of the Smartgauge makes it an expensive test. If anyone knows a way of getting one either free or at a heavily discounted price to test over say two or even better four years then I would be willing to fit it to my boat and publish the findings. On the face of it the Smartgauge looks the ideal boat battery monitor but the blurb written about it is too much on the this is the perfect solution. Sorry the engineer in me is very unconvinced.

Thursday,5 September, 2013
9:11 am
Avatar
Aldermaston
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 292
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Clearly you are not going to be moved on this issue GM Wink

I tried to give a balanced view of the shunt based v Smartguage systems. Many far more qualified than you or I vouch for the accuracy of the latter. It seems that solar charging can throw it out for a while though, but this pales into insignificance with the regular re-calibration of battery capacity with shunt based systems where the batteries are not regularly charged to a true 100% SOC. I feel I can afford to say this as I have two shunt based monitors.

I understand the Smartguage designer is working on a version that includes shunt/current measuring as well.

Regards – Richard –
Ecky Thump

Thursday,5 September, 2013
9:43 am
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Clearly you are not going to be moved on this issue GM  I tried to give a balanced view of the shunt based v Smartguage systems. Many far more qualified than you or I vouch for the accuracy of the latter. It seems that solar charging can throw it out for a while though, but this pales into insignificance with the regular re-calibration of battery capacity with shunt based systems where the batteries are not regularly charged to a true 100% SOC. I feel I can afford to say this as I have two shunt based monitors. I understand the Smartguage designer is working on a version that includes shunt/current measuring as well.

@richardhula mmmm Interesting what do you know of my qualifications, experience, knowledge or how long I have been around boats batteries etc, I find your your comment “far more qualified than you” quite insulting and patronising.

I had heard rumours that a shunt version was muted but not that it was actually about to pop. When I asked the question why if the existing is so good why add a shunt, there was a total silence. I really think the case for the needing to measure the current (adding a shunt) has just been made. Thank you richardhula

Like all measurements and measuring equipment, calibration is the key. In the case of battery monitoring if you can get the necessary information from the Manufacturer then that calibration can be that much more accurate and stable.

Thursday,5 September, 2013
9:13 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 116
Member Since:
Wednesday,17 April, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ecky thump, and I thought a boat wasn’t rocket science!Laugh

Friday,6 September, 2013
8:13 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 637
Member Since:
Tuesday,18 September, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Matty Smith installed my solar panels and Smartguage.  Very reasonable rates and excellent work (and a very friendly guy).

Website http://oldfriendscanalservices…..eebly.com/

I have no connection other than as a friend.

Retired; Somerset/Dorset border when not out and about on Lucy Lowther

Days without name and hours without number

http://thelovelylisanarrowboat.blogspot.co.uk
 
Friday,6 September, 2013
9:20 am
Avatar
Continuous Cruiser
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 968
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Alan said
Matty Smith installed my solar panels and Smartguage.  Very reasonable rates and excellent work (and a very friendly guy).

Website http://oldfriendscanalservices…..eebly.com/

I have no connection other than as a friend.

Agree with you Alan. Although he’s never done any work for me, we have met Matty several times in widely apart places and have always found him a friendly and knowledgable guy.

 

Regards

Pete

Living retirement in the slow lane.

20 years hiring, 6 years of shared ownership and a Continuous Cruiser since 2007 but still learning!

Friday,6 September, 2013
10:33 pm
Avatar
Aldermaston
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 292
Member Since:
Thursday,12 January, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

GM said
@richardhula mmmm Interesting what do you know of my qualifications, experience, knowledge or how long I have been around boats batteries etc, I find your your comment “far more qualified than you” quite insulting and patronising.

I had heard rumours that a shunt version was muted but not that it was actually about to pop. When I asked the question why if the existing is so good why add a shunt, there was a total silence. I really think the case for the needing to measure the current (adding a shunt) has just been made. Thank you richardhula

Like all measurements and measuring equipment, calibration is the key. In the case of battery monitoring if you can get the necessary information from the Manufacturer then that calibration can be that much more accurate and stable.

Apologies GM I did not mean to insult or patronise. My comments were based upon the fact that you dismissed one popular and easy to fit technology on the grounds that you found it inaccurate. You also quoted my comments out of context. 

I just wished to present a balanced view on this issue and point out the caveats with various systems and how one doesn’t suit everyone.

I don’t think I’m speaking out of turn when I suggest that most just want a fuel gauge for their batteries. As MikeEaves says boats aren’t rocker science so why make them so.

Regards – Richard –
Ecky Thump

Saturday,7 September, 2013
12:18 am
Avatar
Where the mood takes me, from the south coast to the canals of England/Wales
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 462
Member Since:
Wednesday,5 December, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

GM said @richardhula mmmm Interesting what do you know of my qualifications, experience, knowledge or how long I have been around boats batteries etc, I find your your comment “far more qualified than you” quite insulting and patronising. I had heard rumours that a shunt version was muted but not that it was actually about to pop. When I asked the question why if the existing is so good why add a shunt, there was a total silence. I really think the case for the needing to measure the current (adding a shunt) has just been made. Thank you richardhula Like all measurements and measuring equipment, calibration is the key. In the case of battery monitoring if you can get the necessary information from the Manufacturer then that calibration can be that much more accurate and stable. Apologies GM I did not mean to insult or patronise. My comments were based upon the fact that you dismissed one popular and easy to fit technology on the grounds that you found it inaccurate. You also quoted my comments out of context.  I just wished to present a balanced view on this issue and point out the caveats with various systems and how one doesn’t suit everyone. I don’t think I’m speaking out of turn when I suggest that most just want a fuel gauge for their batteries. As MikeEaves says boats aren’t rocker science so why make them so.

mmmm I am sorry if you think I took your comments out of context. As an engineer I try to keep an open mind about things. In this particular case I have over the last few weeks been researching battery monitoring for a boat that I am working on and have read and studied everything I could lay my hands on about the Smartgauge and other monitoring systems. I also spoke to specialist battery suppliers to get their opinions. On the face of it the Smartgauge would have made the fitting of a monitoring systems to the boat that I am working on a lot easier. Regrettably, I have been unable to get convincing data that the non-shunt version will do all is required of it.

I can quite agree that most people just want a battery fuel gauge. A good simple voltmeter will do that just using the quiescent voltages of the batteries at a far lower price. Interesting thought don’t fuel gauges generally measure the volume of fuel used and not the pressure.

Batteries are one of the most expensive consumable that any boat has, they have to be replaced many times in the life of a boat. By using a good battery monitoring system and learning what it is telling you maybe the owners could extend the life of their batteries, save fuel etc.

As always wherever I post I give my opinion and it is up to the readers to either accept what I say or dismiss it. The only caveat is that I write what I believe to be true based on my experience, and knowledge.

Saturday,7 September, 2013
2:22 pm
Avatar
round ‘n’ about
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 60
Member Since:
Wednesday,30 March, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Smartgauge for me :-)  

 

I just open the cupboard, press the button see what % is left, look out the window to see if there is enough sun for solar and bung the geni on if not and go and do something more interesting.

 

It only took me an hour to fit and most of that was woodwork mounting the display. 

 

My bats cost well under eq £800! About £370 for five and that was from midland swindlers! 

 

I try not to use the engine for charging as it uses 1.5l/hr and costs about 30p/hr for a basic 250hr service.

James and Debbie

NB Lois Jane
http://nb-lois-jane.blogspot.co.uk/

Monday,9 September, 2013
11:58 am
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 183
Member Since:
Monday,21 May, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi De Ogz… interested in your post here.

I’ve spent a while (too long really) trying to figure out if it’s better to have a generator or run the engine. Initally marina based and looking to be CCers when life permits we want to be self sufficient for apprx 6-7 days and then move on… ie the engine gets run anyway.

I’m curious about how long you run the gen (size?) for to recharge (what’s the total batt capaicity you have?) and how far discharged the bank was?

My struggle is that the engine is there anyway vs having to buy a gen and then run and service that as well. I think when we CC we will only do about 250hrs a year so we’ll hit the engine service point of ‘once a year’ anyway.

Add to the mix solar, the extra cost of an LPG or diesel gen (don’t want petrol on the boat) and my head hurts !!!

Lastly I noticed on your blog you have an ‘engine hood’… how do get on with that for nosie and servicing?

Apols for so many questions… hope you don’t mind :)  

Comments from anyone on gen running times most welcome.

PB

 

Monday,9 September, 2013
1:26 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
Monday,8 April, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

To Paul B,

No experience from on narrowboats but lots of research and previous knowledge of all things mechanical/electrical from my time in the RN.

 

General facts – Generator will use less fuel than your engine for the same amount of power transferred to your batteries.

                    Generator will not need to be serviced as often.

                    Currently the generator qualifies for the cheaper rate of diesel taxation. May need separate fuel tank soon though if EU get                       their way.

                    Generator needs space, a valuable commodity on a narrowboat. This can never be regained.

                    It will take a long time, as in years, for the savings in running costs to be equal to the extra original purchase cost of the                           generator system. 

 

                   Your battery bank will benefit from being fully charged up but the charger controllers as run by either your engines alternator                       or your generator while possibly being able to do the type of charging required are not capable of reducing the effect of light                       load running on either.

                    A few solar panels will soon pay back the initial investment on this matter. Fitting an mppt controller will also gain you approx                       25% extra power from your panels as well. 

 

                    If you moor up in a marina and you connect to shore power it will certainly be a cheaper option (as a means of charging your                     battery), obviously the costs of that mooring and electrical charges have to be considered.

 

The real question you need to ask yourself is what will your be operating cycle be? how many hours per day cruising/stationary, how long between marina berth stays, how much power will you use when not running the engine. Can you modify your power needs? e.g. less tv watching. How much are you willing to spend on batteries.

Everything about living on a narrowboat comes down to one word COMPROMISE. 

All of this needs to be considered in order to get the right decision for you and your boat but the general facts as above will hold true.  

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 298

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

pearley: 968

Alan: 637

GM: 462

deckhand: 296

richardhula: 292

Paul B: 183

Johny London: 142

martincowin: 120

MikeEaves: 116

Our Nige: 110

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 71

Members: 15870

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 10

Topics: 1461

Posts: 9028

Administrators: Paul Smith: 1797